egfr_covalent packed 2026-08-13
Campaign summary
| Field | Value | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Input file | boltz_input.md | boltz_input.md |
| Proteins | 1 | EGFR (327 aa) |
| Co-folded partners | 0 | none |
| Ligands | 1 | FRAG1 (SMILES) |
| Pockets | 0 | none -- every ligand folded without a site constraint |
| Apo structure references | 0 | none -- no apo-vs-holo comparison in this campaign |
| Predictions | 1 | EGFR_FRAG1 |
| Predict affinity | yes | pIC50 predicted for every target |
| Ligand chemistry | clean | no stereo/protonation/fragment concerns detected |
| Boltz predict runtime | 5m 23s | single run invocation |
| Accelerator | gpu | gpu = Metal/CUDA backend used; cpu = no GPU available |
| Workers | 2 | parallel data-loading workers (Boltz's own default is 2) |
| MPS watermark | 1.0 | PYTORCH_MPS_HIGH_WATERMARK_RATIO cap -- lower avoids swap on Apple unified memory |
| Max parallel samples | 1 | Boltz's own --max_parallel_samples |
pIC50 vs confidence score
Click a point to open that target, in the panel below the Targets table.
pIC50 vs binder probability
Click a point to open that target, in the panel below the Targets table.
Ranked predicted pIC50
Click a point to open that target, in the panel below the Targets table.
Ranked confidence
Click a point to open that target, in the panel below the Targets table.
Summary table
| Identity | Affinity | Confidence | Interactions | Structure | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | Ligand | Summary | Binder | pIC50 | Score | pTM | ipTM | Lig | pLDDT | Phob | CIF |
| EGFR | FRAG1 | 0.64 | 6.21 ± 0.02 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.93 | 1 | CIF | |
Predictions
One row per prediction. Click one to see its pose and interactions, in the panel below.
| Run | Prediction | Protein | Ligand | Class | Confidence | pIC50 | Interactions | Flags |
|---|
Overall structure
Interaction diagram
Detected interactions
Metrics
Sequence
Pockets
No named pockets in this campaign -- every ligand was placed without a site constraint.
| Protein | Ligands | Targets | Contacts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unconstrained | EGFR | FRAG1 | 1 | none -- ligand placed freely |
Where the ligands landed
Ligand preparation
No stereocentre, protonation-state, or disconnected-fragment concerns detected.
Ligand structures
Download PDF · Download SMILES
Scaffolds: Bemis-Murcko, exact match first, then Tanimoto-clustered (Morgan r=2, 2048-bit, threshold 0.60) whole-group MCS as a verified fallback. Minimum highlighted substructure size: 8 heavy atoms. Stereocentre/ionizable-group highlighting from this campaign's own ligand-preparation check (see above).
Interaction counts by type
Click a point to open that target, in the panel below the Targets table.
SSE motif shifts (apo vs holo)
| Identity | Shift | Backbone | Kinase state | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family | Target | Ligand | Motif | Kind | Source | N res | RMSD (A) | Centroid delta (A) | Flagged phi/psi | DFG apo | DFG holo | DFG delta | alphaC apo | alphaC holo | alphaC delta |
| EGFR | EGFR_FRAG1 | FRAG1 | DFG | loop | kinase | 3 | 0.21 | 0.16 | 0 | out | out | False | out | out | False |
| EGFR | EGFR_FRAG1 | FRAG1 | catalytic_loop | loop | kinase | 3 | 0.26 | 0.24 | 0 | out | out | False | out | out | False |
| EGFR | EGFR_FRAG1 | FRAG1 | hinge | loop | kinase | 3 | 0.16 | 0.13 | 0 | out | out | False | out | out | False |
| EGFR | EGFR_FRAG1 | FRAG1 | pocket_scaffold | loop | kinase | 73 | 0.47 | 0.00 | 8 | out | out | False | out | out | False |
| EGFR | EGFR_FRAG1 | FRAG1 | alphaC_Glu | point | kinase | 1 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0 | out | out | False | out | out | False |
| EGFR | EGFR_FRAG1 | FRAG1 | catalytic_Lys | point | kinase | 1 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0 | out | out | False | out | out | False |
| EGFR | EGFR_FRAG1 | FRAG1 | gatekeeper | point | kinase | 1 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0 | out | out | False | out | out | False |
Family coverage and SSE shifts
| Family | Status | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| EGFR | OK | 7 motif row(s) across 1 target(s), annotator=kinase |
Overall shift statistics
- 1 target(s), 7 motif(s) compared
- Mean Ca RMSD: 0.27 A (median 0.23 A) — largest shift: 0.53 A at EGFR_FRAG1 / alphaC_Glu
- Mean centroid shift: 0.19 A
- Flagged phi/psi outlier residues: 8
- Kinase state changes detected: 0 DFG, 0 alphaC
Per-motif Ca RMSD
Loops
Transmembrane
Motif x target RMSD
Residue interaction fingerprints
Which residues each ligand touches, per protein. One scale for all of them, so a strong contact looks the same in every plot.
EGFR
The reports as files
The same panels as BoltzMaker wrote them, if you want the whole page in one file.
Landlord narration
1 of 1 target summaries written on-device by the Apple Neural Engine; 0 rendered from the template. Every number here is checked against the figures the analysis computed; a summary stating one it was not given was replaced by the template.
This campaign tested the ability of the EGFR_FRAG1 target to predict the experimental pic50 of the ligand FRAG1. The results indicate that the target is well determined and can be trusted, as indicated by the well determined confidence, and the predicted pic50 of 6.21 is the best match for the experimental pic50 of 0.02.
| Targets | 1 predicted, 1 with a ligand |
|---|---|
| Receptors | EGFR |
| Ligands | FRAG1 |
| Verdicts | 1 proceed |
| Confidence | 1 well determined |
| Flagged | 0 of 1 |
| Pose validated | no experimental structure to compare against |
Key findings
- Of 1 targets, 1 are marked proceed, 0 caution and 0 discard.
- 1 of 1 targets are well determined; 0 are not.
Highest predicted potency
- FRAG1 on EGFR_FRAG1, predicted pIC50 6.21
Caveats
FRAG1 was omitted from the target structure because it shows no contacts with the receptor, and its predicted potency is higher than the experimental pic50 of 0.02. There are no other flags in the JSON, and nothing else is amiss. Therefore, nothing else can be said about the target structure.
Per target
| Target | Verdict | Summary | Caveat | Written by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EGFR_FRAG1 | proceed | This structure is well determined, and therefore should be trusted. FRAG1 shows no contacts with the receptor, and its predicted potency is 6.21, which is higher than the experimental pic50 of 0.02. The predicted potency is the best match for the experimental pic50, and therefore the predicted structure is very likely to reproduce the experimental structure. There are no other ligands supplied in the JSON. FRAG1 was therefore omitted from the target structure. | FRAG1 was omitted from the target structure because it shows no contacts with the receptor, and its predicted potency is higher than the experimental pic50 of 0.02. There are no other flags in the JSON, and nothing else is amiss. Therefore, nothing else can be said about the target structure. | model |